REP 2004 3.v.b has the recommendation that QL1 and QL2 packages should be registered “with a centralized list of ‘Level N’ packages, if one exists, to allow for peer review of the claim”.
Having looked through a few QL1 and QL2 packages and their quality declarations, I haven’t actually found any reference to such a “centralized” list.
Does anyone know if such a list exists already? If not, is there interest in starting one?
I understand the QL system is relatively new, and that 3.v.b is listed as a recommendation rather than a requirement. But I still think having such a public list would be beneficial to the community, both to give a sense of the overall maturity of ROS 2, and to potentially guide development focus towards maturing specific core packages.
For what it’s worth, a while back I compiled a list of ROS 2 packages from REP 2005 and their associated quality levels (463.3 KB), so I have the data for such a list; I wouldn’t know where it should live though…