Why? He seems to be the only one doing what he was actually elected to do.
Because his term is up. The representative elections tick-tock every year as I explained here. For the first election the lowest ranking of the candidates was given the one year term, so Brett’s term is up this year. He is free to run again if he so chooses.
According to rule 7 of the TSC charter, @musaup should already be automatically removed in accordance with the participation rule.
https://docs.ros.org/en/humble/The-ROS2-Project/Governance/ROS2-TSC-Charter.html
TSC community reps.pdf (14.5 KB)
Why should the community be forced to keep a representative who only shows up to half the meetings? Does the TSC follow it’s own rules?
I can bring this up with the TSC at the December meeting. However, if there is an election it will be a separate issue from the current election. The TSC will need to amend the charter to provide clarification on how a special election will work as it is presently undefined.