@Katherine_Scott thanks for clarifying, it helps knowing this is just the result of a preliminary assessment. This wasn’t clear to me while reading the following (and I obviously wasn’t in the TSC meeting room):
That’s precisely what I did above, no conclusions on my end just yet:
Note though that your assessment is still confusing. Above you say you’ve reported on trends. Where’s the trend in here (taken from your report)?
- B. Usage demos on NVIDIA Isaac Transport
This is not even a released product, so of course there’s no match in answers.ros.org.
I’m sorry if the above reads harsh. It really isn’t my intention but frankly, I think the topic deserves proper context and discussion. Discussing and collecting community feedback is what this forum is for since its inception. Documentation is hard and hardware acceleration is not an easy topic. It’s my day job, so I was volunteering to help (and still do!) with some of my spare cycles.
Happy to help if you @Katherine_Scott and Sumedh can ping me while working on hardware acceleration docs but let’s please capture the ongoing discussion at the HAWG, collect feedback from its members and use the material generated (e.g. we launched a hardware acceleration acceleration survey a while ago successfully collecting about 100 entries of community participants and HAWG members, this should help prioritize what to document first).