REP-2004: Package Quality Categories

[wjwwood]

I posted about it again here:

RFC: REP-2004 Package Quality Categories

I’d like to share with everyone a REP that we’ve been working on which aims to improve the quality of our core packages, and encourage package maintainers to take a more active role in documenting the processes and practices which affect the quality of their packages. tl;dr I encourage you all to have a look at our REP pull request here: And leave any comments you have on that pull request. We would very much appreciate your feedback and we’ll do our best to respond to everyone and incorpora…

So we can have a fresh thread to do voting and so it is in the general category.