Could I convince you to bring the meeting 2 hours earlier or 3 or 4 hours later? Either option makes it more feasible for those of us in the Asian and Western Pacific timezones to attend. The former is probably more preferable for those in Europe, of course.
Hi @gbiggs - What time zone are you in? We also have East coast attendees, so I’m not sure what time overlaps for you and them. I’m happy to move it if we can find a good time. Although I don’t want to change this week, I could starting next week. We could also have additional meetings for other time zones like yours.
I’m in Japan, so the timezone is GMT+9. I have another meeting (unrelated project) every Monday which also features people from both coasts of the USA, Europe, and Asia. The time we use that works well for everyone is:
San Francisco, USA Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:00 PDT
Washington DC, USA Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 11:00 EDT
Berlin, Germany Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 16:00 CET
Tokyo, Japan Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 00:00 JST
Corresponding UTC Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 15:00
This is why I suggested two hours earlier. Four hours later also works if people from Europe are willing to attend a late meeting:
San Francisco, USA Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 14:00 PDT
Washington DC, USA Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 17:00 EDT
Berlin, Germany Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 22:00 CET
Tokyo, Japan Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 06:00 JST
Corresponding UTC Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 21:00
If the only viable solution is to have separate meetings then I would say don’t. The QA group tried doing that for a while and it turned into a disconnect between the two different segments.
I probably won’t be able to make this morning’s meeting.
As for discussion of alternate times – as an East Coast person, I would prefer 2 hours earlier rather than 3 or 4 hours later (starts to run into dinner time).